Step 1 :State the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in GRE scores after taking the training course, denoted as \(H0: \mu_D = 0\). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant difference in GRE scores after taking the training course, denoted as \(H1: \mu_D \neq 0\).
Step 2 :Identify a test statistic. Since the standard deviation is known and the sample size is small, a t-test for dependent samples is used.
Step 3 :Determine the critical region. For a two-tailed test with \(\alpha = .05\) and degrees of freedom \(df = n - 1 = 9 - 1 = 8\), the critical values from a t-distribution table are -2.306 and +2.306.
Step 4 :Calculate the test statistic and make a decision. The test statistic t is calculated as \(t = (MD - \mu_D) / (sD / \sqrt{n}) = (17 - 0) / (18 / \sqrt{9}) = 17 / 6 = 2.83\). Since the calculated t (2.83) is greater than the critical value (2.306), the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, \(\boxed{\text{There is a significant difference in GRE scores after taking the training course.}}\)
Step 5 :Calculate Cohen's d to measure the effect size. Cohen's d is calculated as \(d = MD / sD = 17 / 18 = 0.94\). According to Cohen's conventions, an effect size of 0.94 is considered large.
Step 6 :Calculate R-squared to measure the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable. R-squared is calculated as \(r^2 = t^2 / (t^2 + df) = 2.83^2 / (2.83^2 + 8) = 7.9889 / (7.9889 + 8) = 7.9889 / 15.9889 = 0.5\). Therefore, \(\boxed{50\%\text{ of the variance in the GRE scores can be explained by the training course.}}\)