Step 1 :The null hypothesis (H0) is that the proportion of subjects who develop rhinovirus infections is the same for both the echinacea and placebo groups (p1 = p2). The alternative hypothesis (H1) is that the proportions are not the same (p1 ≠ p2).
Step 2 :We are given the number of subjects who developed infections in each group and the total number of subjects in each group. We can use this information to calculate the sample proportions.
Step 3 :We can then use these sample proportions to calculate the test statistic (z) and the P-value. The test statistic is a measure of how far our sample statistic is from the hypothesized population parameter, in terms of standard errors. The P-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as the one we calculated, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
Step 4 :If the P-value is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections. If the P-value is greater than the significance level, we do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that echinacea does not have an effect on rhinovirus infections.
Step 5 :The test statistic (z) is approximately 1.14 and the P-value is approximately 0.252. Since the P-value is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis. This means that we do not have enough evidence to conclude that echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.
Step 6 :Final Answer: The null hypothesis is \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) and the alternative hypothesis is \(H_{1}: p_{1} \neq p_{2}\). The test statistic is approximately \(\boxed{1.14}\) and the P-value is approximately \(\boxed{0.252}\). Since the P-value is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis. This means that we do not have enough evidence to conclude that echinacea has an effect on rhinovirus infections.